[Site "SELENT"]
[Date "2014.11.16"]
[Round "?"]
[White "SELENT"]
[Black "WINGLAP"]
[Result "*"]
[BlackElo "2400"]
[ECO "E57"]
[Opening "Nimzo-Indisch (Moderne Variante), 8...dxc4 9.Bxc4 cxd4 10.exd4"]
[Time "09:27:09"]
[Variation "4.e3 O-O 5.Nf3 d5 6.Bd3"]
[WhiteElo "2400"]
[TimeControl "600"]
[Termination "unterminated"]
[PlyCount "27"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 {(Sb1-c3 Sb8-c6 Sg1-f3 Sg8-f6 c4-c5 Sf6-e4 e2-e3)
+0.11/10 1} Bb4 4. e3 Nf6 {(Sg8-f6 Sg1-f3 O-O Lf1-d3 c7-c5 O-O Sb8-c6 h2-h3
Lc8-d7 a2-a3) -0.18/13 1} 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Bd3 c5 7. O-O dxc4 8. Bxc4 {(Ld3xc4
c5xd4 e3xd4 Sb8-c6 h2-h3 h7-h6 Lc1-f4 Sf6-d5 Sc3xd5 e6xd5 Lc4-d3) +0.22/12
2} cxd4 {(c5xd4 e3xd4 Sb8-c6 h2-h3 Lb4-d6 Lc1-e3 a7-a6 Ta1-c1 h7-h6)
-0.24/11 1} 9. exd4 {(e3xd4 Sb8-c6 h2-h3 Lb4-d6 Lc1-e3 a7-a6 Ta1-c1 h7-h6)
+0.24/12 0} Nc6 {(Sb8-c6 h2-h3 Lb4-d6 Lc1-e3 h7-h6 Ta1-c1 a7-a6 Dd1-d2)
-0.25/11 0} 10. a3 Bd6 11. Re1 {(Tf1-e1 Dd8-b6 Lc1-g5 Tf8-d8 Lg5xf6 g7xf6
Dd1-d3 Sc6-a5 Lc4-a2 Sa5-c6) +0.22/12 12} Qb6 12. Bg5 Be7 {(Ld6-e7 Sc3-a4
Db6-c7 Ta1-c1 Tf8-d8 b2-b4 a7-a6 Sa4-c5 b7-b5) -0.25/12 14} 13. Na4 Qc7 14.
Rc1 *
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Sc3 Lb4
Es gibt da einen ganz wichtigen Punkt. Nach 4. a3! Lxc3+ 5. bxc3 Sf6 entsteht die Sämisch-Variante mit bereits geschehenem ...d5. Dies gilt seit der Partie Botwinnik-Capablanca , AVRO 1938 als vorteilhaft für Weiss. Es wird deswegen weit seltener gepielt als 5. ...c5 oder 5. ... 0-0 in der entsprechenden Nimzoinidisch-Zugfolge.
- 3...Bb4?! confusing a Nimzo–Indian with a Queen’s Gambit (also known as the Berg defense), and at this point an inaccuracy. White has at least two good continuations: 4.Qa4+ Nc6 5.Nf3 where Black is forced to block the c-pawn with the knight, and 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 and White has the bishop pair almost for free (on the average worth half a pawn), since cxd5 is unstoppable and there will be no doubled pawns as a counterbalance.[5]
