"Strengthening the solidarity of Europe’s oligarchs
is not a good strategy for empowering Europe’s majority. Quite the contrary. Any
“recovery” based on such a formula will short-change almost all Europeans and
push the majority into deeper despair."
ATHENS – The euro crisis
that erupted a decade ago has long been portrayed as a clash between Europe’s
frugal North and profligate South. In fact, at its heart was a fierce class war
that left Europe, including its capitalists, much weakened, relative to the
United States and China. Worse still, the European Union’s response to the
pandemic, including the EU recovery fund currently under deliberation, is bound
to intensify this class war, and deal another blow to Europe’s socioeconomic
model.
If we have learned
anything in recent decades, it is the pointlessness of focusing on any country’s
economy in isolation. Once upon a time, when money moved between countries
mostly to finance trade, and most consumption spending benefited domestic
producers, the strengths and weaknesses of a national economy could be
separately assessed. Not anymore. Today, the weaknesses of, say, China and
Germany are intertwined with those of countries like the US and Greece.
The unshackling of finance
in the early 1980s, following the elimination of capital controls left over from
the Bretton Woods system, enabled enormous trade imbalances to be funded by
rivers of money created privately via financial engineering. As the US shifted
from a trade surplus to a massive deficit, its hegemony grew. Its imports
maintain global demand and are financed by the inflows of foreigners’ profits
that pour into Wall Street.
This strange recycling
process is managed by the world’s de facto central bank, the US Federal
Reserve. And maintaining such an impressive creation – a permanently imbalanced
global system – necessitates the constant intensification of class war in
deficit and surplus countries alike.
Deficit countries are all
alike in one important sense: whether powerful like the US, or weak like Greece,
they are condemned to generate debt bubbles as their workers helplessly watch
industrial areas morph into rustbelts. Once the bubbles burst, workers in the
Midwest or the Peloponnese face debt bondage and plummeting living
standards.
Although surplus
countries, too, are characterized by class warfare against workers, they differ
significantly from one another. Consider China and Germany. Both feature large
trade surpluses with the US and the rest of Europe. Both repress their workers’
income and wealth. The main difference between them is that China maintains huge
levels of investment through a domestic credit bubble, while Germany’s
corporations invest much less and rely on credit bubbles in the rest of the
eurozone.
The euro crisis was never
a clash between the Germans and the Greeks (shorthand for the fabled North-South
clash). Instead, it stemmed from an intensification of class war within Germany
and within Greece at the hands of an oligarchy-without-frontiers living off
financial flows.
For example, when the
Greek state went bankrupt in 2010, the austerity imposed on most of the Greek
population did wonders to restrict investment in Greece. But it did the same in
Germany, indirectly repressing German wages at a time when the European Central
Bank’s money-printing was sending share prices (and German directors’ bonuses)
through the roof.
Class warfare is arguably
more brutal in China and the US than it is in Europe. But Europe’s lack of a
political union ensures that its class war verges on being pointless, even from
the capitalists’ perspective.
Evidence that German
capitalists squandered the wealth extracted from the EU’s working classes is not
hard to find. The euro crisis caused a massive 7%
devaluation of the surpluses that the German private sector had accumulated
from 1999 onwards, because capital owners had no alternative but to lend these
trillions to foreigners whose subsequent distress led to large losses.
This is not only a German
problem. It is a condition afflicting the EU’s other surplus countries as well.
The German newspaper Handelsblatt recently revealed a notable
reversal. Whereas in 2007, EU corporations earned around €100 billion ($113
billion) more than their US counterparts, in 2019 the situation was
inverted.
Moreover, this is an
accelerating trend. In 2019, corporate earnings rose 50% faster in the US than
in Europe. And US corporate earnings are expected to suffer less from the
pandemic-induced recession, falling 20% in 2020, compared to 33% in Europe.
The gist of Europe’s
conundrum is that, while it is a surplus economy, its fragmentation ensures that
the income losses of German and Greek workers do not even become sustainable
profits for Europe’s capitalists. In short, behind the narrative of northern
frugality lurks the specter of wasted exploitation.
Reports that COVID-19
caused the EU to raise its game are grossly exaggerated. The quiet death of
European debt mutualization guarantees that the gigantic increase in national
budget deficits will be followed by equally sizeable austerity in every country.
In other words, the class war that has already eroded most people’s incomes will
intensify. “But what about the proposed €750 billion recovery fund?” one might
ask. “Is the agreement to issue common debt not a breakthrough?”
Yes and no. Common debt
instruments are a necessary but insufficient condition for ameliorating the
intensified class war. To play a progressive role, common debt must fund the
weaker households and firms across the common economic area: in Germany as well
as in Greece. And it must do so automatically, without reliance on the kindness
of the local oligarchs. It must operate like an automated recycling mechanism
that shifts surpluses to those in deficit within every town, region, and state.
In the US, for example, food stamps and social security payments support the
weak in California and in Missouri, while shifting net resources from California
to Missouri – and all without any involvement by state governors or local
bureaucrats.
By contrast, the EU
recovery fund’s fixed allocation to member states will turn them against one
another, as the fixed sum to be given to, say, Italy or Greece is portrayed as a
tax on Germany’s working class. Moreover, the idea is to transfer the funds to
national governments, effectively entrusting the local oligarchy with the task
of distributing them.
Strengthening the
solidarity of Europe’s oligarchs is not a good strategy for empowering Europe’s
majority. Quite the contrary. Any “recovery” based on such a formula will
short-change almost all Europeans and push the majority into deeper
despair.
For
the Irish Examiner site click here.
For the Project Syndicate site click here.
|
|